Revision summary
The plot is on a fort, far from children, costly, and tied to a predecessor’s relative as Sarpanch. Likely interests are cheap heritage land, contractors, speculators and prestige stones. Silent waiting on the superior is obedience that hides facts. Phone advice lacks a trail; consulting the predecessor as guide is compromised. Best path: recorded inspection, written alert, heritage notice, and a real school site in the village.
Model answer
Introduction
A school on a fort wall is not a paperwork slip. It looks like a land play using a children’s building as cover. My job is to protect students, heritage and the file, not the predecessor’s family story.
Body
Stakeholders
- Children who would walk to a fort far from the village, and parents.
- Heritage of Thakurgarh Fort and the public who own it.
- Present Sarpanch and villagers who need a real school.
- Your predecessor, the then Sarpanch (a relative), and possible private speculators on the village-side land.
- Superior officer, chief engineer and senior architect about to visit.
- You as the district head of the department, new to the chair.
(a) Likely vested interests
- Predecessor and then Sarpanch: a cheap transfer of fort land that should never have been sold as a “plot”, perhaps with a later regularisation or a quiet private use of leftover ground.
- Speculators on the habitable village-side land: keep the school away so that residential expansion stays in private hands, or the reverse — use a future “failed school” to unlock fort-adjacent real estate.
- Contractors: high development charges on a ruin mean a fat civil work.
- Local political actors: a foundation stone on a historic site as prestige, regardless of children.
- Officers who signed two clearances: a past favour, a future silence.
- None of this is yet a proved crime. It is enough to stop a naive “all in order” note.
Values
- Children’s best interest and Article 21A (education that is actually reachable).
- Heritage protection; a fort is not a vacant lot.
- Integrity, courage, and a speaking file.
- Loyalty to the Constitution, not to a predecessor.
(b) Options given, merits and demerits
- Option 1: Await the visit and let the superior decide, saying nothing inconvenient.
- Merit: hierarchy; you look obedient; conflict is postponed.
- Demerit: you become a host for a possibly illegal inspection; children and heritage stay at risk; you may be treated as having hidden facts you already saw.
- Option 2: Seek the superior’s advice in writing, or only on the phone.
- Written advice: merit is a trail and shared responsibility; demerit is delay if the visit is tomorrow, and a superior who is already committed to the site may dictate a cover-up on letterhead.
- Phone only: merit is speed; demerit is no record, easy denial, and you remain alone if the story turns.
- Option 3: Consult predecessor and colleagues, then decide.
- Merit: colleagues may know alternate land and the architect’s silence; institutional memory.
- Demerit: the predecessor is a party in interest. Consulting him as a guide is like asking the fox about the coop. Informal chats can become a collusive story.
- Option 4: Find whether an alternate plot near the village can be exchanged, then send a comprehensive written report.
- Merit: solves the children’s distance, flags heritage, puts costs and the missing architect certificate on paper, and offers a way forward rather than only a scandal.
- Demerit: exchange takes time and Panchayat politics; a written report may anger the superior before the visit. Still the least bad of the listed paths.
Other option I would add
- Option 5 (preferred mix): Immediately record a site inspection note: fort walls, distance, missing architect clearance, heritage risk, predecessor–Sarpanch relation as a fact to be inquired, not as gossip. Inform the superior in writing before the visit, with photographs, and request that the visit become an inquiry into suitability, not a foundation-stone rehearsal. Alert the competent heritage authority (Archaeological Survey of India or State archaeology, as the law of that fort requires) that a school is proposed on ramparts. Start a parallel, transparent search for a village-side site with the current Panchayat, not the old Sarpanch. If a crime appears, send a vigilance note through the proper channel; do not leak a media circus that destroys the school idea itself.
- Merit: truth before the VIP party arrives; children and monument both protected; you still offer a school, which is the public purpose.
- Demerit: you may be labelled obstructionist; that is cheaper than a collapsed wall or a CAG paragraph with your signature on the old file.
What I would not do
- I would not “regularise” the fort plot to save a visit’s face.
- I would not sit on the architect’s missing certificate.
- I would not hand the decision to the predecessor as a courtesy.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD FILE[Old file two clearances] --> VISIT[Site: fort not village] VISIT --> NOTE[Written inspection note] NOTE --> SUP[Inform superior before VIP visit] NOTE --> HER[Heritage authority] NOTE --> ALT[Village-side alternate plot] SIL[Silent wait] --> COM[Complicity]
Conclusion
Vested interests likely sit in cheap fort land, village-side speculation, fat civil works and a family link at acquisition. Waiting silently is complicity. Phone advice without a record is weak. The workable path is a written site report, heritage alert, alternate land near children, and a visit that inspects rather than blesses.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Case study. You are recently posted as district development officer of a district. Shortly thereafter you found that there is considerable tension in the rural areas of your district on the issue of sending girls to schools. The elders of the village feel that many problems have come up because girls are being educated and they are stepping out of the safe environment of the household. They are of the view that the girls should be quickly married off with minimum education. The girls are also competing for jobs after education, which have traditionally remained in boys' exclusive domain, adding to unemployment amongst male population. The younger generation feels that in the present era, girls should have equal opportunities for education and employment, and other means of livelihood. The entire locality is divided between the elders and the younger lot and further sub-divided between sexes in both generations. You come to know that in Panchayat or in other local bodies or even in busy crossroads, the issue is being acrimoniously debated. One day you are informed that an unpleasant incident has taken place. Some girls were molested, when they were en route to school. The incident led to clashes between several groups and a law and order problem has arisen. The elders after heated discussion have taken a joint decision not to allow girls to go to school and to socially boycott all such families, which do not follow their dictate. (a) What steps would you take to ensure girls' safety without disrupting their education? (b) How would you manage and mould the patriarchic attitude of the village elders to ensure harmony in the intergenerational relations?
Next question in the 2015 paper (Q12). View answer →
-
Is it insubordination to write before the superior arrives?
No. Hiding a fort wall is insubordination to the public. A factual note lets the superior decide with eyes open.
-
Should you cancel the school itself?
Cancel this site. Keep the school as a purpose. Children still need classrooms next to the village, not on a rampart.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2016 · Q9 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. ABC Ltd. is a large transnational company having diversified business activities with a huge shareholder base. The company is continuously expanding the generating employment. The company, in its expansion and diversification programme, decides to establish a new plant at Vikaspuri, an area which is underdeveloped. The new plant is designed to use energy efficient technology that will help the company to save production cost by 20%. The company's decision goes well with the Government policy of attracting investment to develop such underdeveloped regions. The government has also announced tax holiday for five years for the companies that invest in underdeveloped areas. However, the new plant may bring chaos for the inhabitants of Vikaspuri region, which is otherwise tranquil. The new plant may result in increased cost of living, aliens migrating to the region, disturbing the social and economic order. The company sensing the possible protest tried to educate the people of Vikaspuri region and public in general that how its Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) policy would help overcome the likely difficulties of the residents of Vikaspuri region. In spite of this the protests begin and some of the residents decided to approach the judiciary as their plea before the Government did not yield any result. (a) Identify the issues involved in the case. (b) What can be suggested to satisfy the company's goal and to address the residents' concern? -
2016 · Q10 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. Saraswati was a successful IT professional in USA. Moved by patriotic sense of doing something for the country she returned to India. Together with some other like-minded friends, she formed an NGO to build a school for a poor rural community. The objective of the school was to provide the best quality modern education at a nominal cost. She soon discovered that she has to seek permission from a number of Government agencies. The rules and procedures were quite confusing and cumbersome. What frustrated her most were delays, callous attitude of officials and constant demand for bribes. Her experience and the experience of many others like her have deterred people from taking up social service projects. A measure of Government control over voluntary social work is necessary. But it should not be exercised in a coercive a corrupt manner. What measures can you suggest to ensure that due control is exercised but well meaning, honest NGO efforts are not thwarted? -
2016 · Q11 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. A fresh engineering graduate gets a job in a prestigious chemical industry. She likes the work. The salary is also good. However, after a few months she accidentally discovers that a highly toxic waste is being secretly discharged into a river nearby. This is causing health problems to the villagers downstream who depend on the river for their water needs. She is perturbed and mentions her concern to her colleagues who have been with the company for longer periods. They advise her to keep quite as anyone who mentions the topic is summarily dismissed. She cannot risk losing her job as she is the sole beard-winner for her family and has to support her ailing parents and siblings. At first, she thinks that if her seniors are keeping quiet, why should she stick out her neck. But her conscience pricks her to do something to save the river and the people who depend upon it. At heart she feels that the advice of silence given by her friends is not correct though she cannot give reasons for it. She thinks you are a wise person and seeks your advice. (a) What arguments can you advance to show her that keeping quiet is not morally right? (b) What course of action would you advice her to adopt and why? -
2015 · Q9 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. One of the scientists working in the R & D laboratory of a major pharmaceutical company discovers that one of the company's best selling veterinary drugs, B has the potential to cure a currently incurable liver disease that is prevalent in tribal areas. However, developing a variant of the drug suitable for human beings entailed a lot of research and development having a huge expenditure to the extent of f 50 crores. It was unlikely that the company would recover the costs as the disease was rampant only in poverty-stricken area having very little market otherwise. If you were the CEO, then- (a) identify the various actions that you could take; (b) evaluate the pros and cons of each of your actions. -
2015 · Q10 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. There is a disaster-prone State having frequent landslides, forest fires, cloudbursts, flash floods and earthquakes, etc. Some of these are seasonal and often unpredictable. The magnitude of the disaster is always unanticipated. During one of the seasons, a cloudburst caused devastating floods and landslides leading to high casualties. There was major damage to infrastructure like roads, bridges and power generating units. This led to more than 100000 pilgrims, tourists and other locals trapped across different routes and locations. The people trapped in your area of responsibility included senior citizens, patients in hospitals, women and children, hikers, tourists, ruling party's regional president along with his family, additional chief secretary of the neighbouring State and prisoners in jail. As a civil services officer of the State, what would be the order in which you would rescue these people and why? Give justifications. -
2015 · Q12 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. You are recently posted as district development officer of a district. Shortly thereafter you found that there is considerable tension in the rural areas of your district on the issue of sending girls to schools. The elders of the village feel that many problems have come up because girls are being educated and they are stepping out of the safe environment of the household. They are of the view that the girls should be quickly married off with minimum education. The girls are also competing for jobs after education, which have traditionally remained in boys' exclusive domain, adding to unemployment amongst male population. The younger generation feels that in the present era, girls should have equal opportunities for education and employment, and other means of livelihood. The entire locality is divided between the elders and the younger lot and further sub-divided between sexes in both generations. You come to know that in Panchayat or in other local bodies or even in busy crossroads, the issue is being acrimoniously debated. One day you are informed that an unpleasant incident has taken place. Some girls were molested, when they were en route to school. The incident led to clashes between several groups and a law and order problem has arisen. The elders after heated discussion have taken a joint decision not to allow girls to go to school and to socially boycott all such families, which do not follow their dictate. (a) What steps would you take to ensure girls' safety without disrupting their education? (b) How would you manage and mould the patriarchic attitude of the village elders to ensure harmony in the intergenerational relations? -
2015 · Q13 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. A private company is known for its efficiency, transparency, and employee welfare. The company though owned by a private individual has a cooperative character where employees feel a sense of ownership. The company employs nearly 700 personnel and they have voluntarily decided not to form a union. One day suddenly in the morning, about 40 men belonging to a political party gatecrashed into the factory demanding jobs in the factory. They threatened the management and employees and also used foul language. The employees feel demoralized. It was clear that those people who gate-crashed wanted to be on the payroll of the company as well as continue as the volunteers/members of the party The company maintains high standards in integrity and does not extend favors to civil administration that also includes law enforcement agencies. Such incidents occur in the public sector also. (a) Assume you are the CEO of the company. What would you do to diffuse the volatile situation on the date of gate-crashing with the violent mob sitting inside the company premises? (b) What could be the long-term solution to the issue discussed in the case? (c) Every solution/action that you suggest will have a positive and a negative impact on you (as CEO), the employees, and the performance of the employees. Analyze the consequences of each of your suggested actions. -
2015 · Q14 · GS IV · 20 marks
Case study. You are the Sarpanch of a Panchayat. There is a primary school run by the government in your area. Midday meals are provided to the children attending the school. The Headmaster has now appointed a new cook in the school to prepare the meals. However, when it is found that the cook is from the Dalit community, almost half of the children belonging to higher castes are not allowed to take meals by their parents. Consequently, the attendance in the school falls sharply. This could result in the possibility of discontinuation of midday meal scheme, thereafter of teaching staff and subsequent closing down the school. (a) Discuss some feasible strategies to overcome the conflict and to create the right ambiance. (b) What should be the responsibilities of different social segments and agencies to create a positive social ambiance for accepting such changes?
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2015 · GS IV · 12 marks
(a) What is meant by 'environmental ethics'? Why is it important to study? Discuss any one environmental issue from the viewpoint of environmental ethics. (10) (b) Differentiate between the following (10 marks) (200 Words) (i) Law and ethics (ii) Ethical management and management of ethics (iii) Discrimination and preferential treatment (iv) Personal Ethics and Professional Ethics.
Ethics and Human Interface
Environmental ethics judges human use of nature by duty to other beings and to future people, not only by this year’s profit. It matters because power and markets can destroy a river faster than custom can stop them; the dam and displacement case is one test. Law is enforceable rule; ethics is the wider right, which may bind when the law is silent or too thin. Ethical management is lived fairness; management of ethics is codes and cells that support it. Discrimination is harmful bias; preferential treatment is a limited constitutional correction. Personal ethics is private conscience; professional ethics is the duty of the chair.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2015 · GS IV · 12 marks
Given are two quotations of moral thinkers/philosophers. For each of these bring out what it means to you in the present context. (a) "The weak can never forgive; forgiveness is the attribute of strong." (10) (b) "We can easily forgive a child who is afraid of the dark; the real tragedy of life is when men are afraid of the light" (10 marks).
Moral Thinkers and Philosophers
Forgiveness is the choice of someone who could retaliate and does not need revenge to remain whole. It is not a command that victims of grave crime hug offenders; justice can come first. In public life, strength is a firm file without spite, and peace after law, not a blood feud. Fear of the light is adult refusal of truth, RTI, science and dissent. The tragedy is punishing the lamp; administration should default to openness, not to a locked cupboard.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2015 · GS IV · 12 marks
(a) "A mere compliance with law is not enough, the public servant also have to have a well developed sensibility to ethical issues for effective discharge of duties" Do you agree? Explain with the help of two examples where (i) an act is ethically right, but not legally and (ii) an act is legally right, but not ethically. (10 Marks) (b) How do the virtues of trustworthiness and fortitude get manifested in public service? Explain with examples (10).
Probity in Governance
Legal compliance is a minimum; ethical sensibility is needed where the section is silent or a paper lie looks complete. An act can be ethically right and legally incomplete, as in a narrowly recorded rescue in a disaster. An act can be legally regular and ethically wrong, as in paying a technically perfect false muster. Trustworthiness is being reliable in figures, promises and impartiality. Fortitude is lasting courage to record a lawful no; together they make public service more than a Gazette.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.