Revision summary
Poverty and malnutrition reinforce each other and show up as stunting, wasting, anaemia and lost learning. The loop is intergenerational through low birth weight and adolescent anaemia. Infection and dirty water turn a calorie into a wasted calorie. Breaks: diverse PDS, ICDS and POSHAN, mid-day meals, toilets and tap water, MGNREGA and women’s income, National Health Mission. Convergence at the panchayat beats siloed schemes. The first thousand days are the human-capital investment. Article 47 already names nutrition as a primary duty of the State.
Model answer
Introduction
- A child who is stunted at two is already paying an adult tax: weaker cognition, more illness, lower wages. A household that is poor feeds that child too little and too poorly. The child then grows into a low-productivity adult, which is human capital lost. Poverty and malnutrition are not two files. They are a loop.
Body
The vicious cycle
Poverty and malnutrition reproduce each other in the same body and then in the next.
- Peg: Poverty means low dietary diversity, early marriage, unpaid women’s labour, and a house without a toilet.
- Peg: Malnutrition — calorie, protein, micronutrient, and the double burden of obesity with anaemia — raises health spend and cuts school attendance.
- Peg: National Family Health Survey findings of stunting, wasting and women’s anaemia, and Annual Status of Education Report learning gaps, sit on the same bodies: height-for-age is a wage forecast.
- Peg: Infection eats nutrients; the loop is intergenerational when an anaemic adolescent girl becomes a low-birth-weight mother.
Steps that break it
The break is several pipes into the same household, not a new scheme name each year.
- Peg: Food: a public distribution system that issues pulses and millets, not only grain; ICDS and POSHAN Abhiyaan that reach the third trimester; PM POSHAN as an attendance and protein tool.
- Peg: Care: ASHA and ANM, iron-folic acid, deworming, exclusive breastfeeding windows.
- Peg: Water and sanitation: toilets that are used, tap water, drains — because diarrhoea is a nutrition policy.
- Peg: Income and health: MGNREGA in drought months, women’s groups, maternity cash that arrives before birth, and National Health Mission work on tuberculosis and sickle cell, because a wasting child is often a sick child.
Governance of the break
Schemes fail when they do not meet in the same child.
- Peg: Convergence of women-and-child, health and rural development at the Gram Panchayat beats siloed photographs.
- Peg: Growth monitoring that is not a forged register, and State nutrition gaps used as a political KPI, are how the first thousand days become infrastructure equal to a highway.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD P[Poverty] --> D[Poor diet and WASH] D --> M[Malnutrition] M --> H[Low human capital] H --> P S[PDS ICDS NHM MGNREGA] --> D S --> M
Conclusion
Poverty feeds malnutrition; malnutrition reproduces poverty in the next body. The break is food diversity, care, sanitation and women’s income in the same household, not a new scheme name each year.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
The Doctrine of Democratic Governance makes it necessary that the public perception of the integrity and commitment of civil servants becomes absolutely positive. Discuss.
Next question in the 2024 paper (Q8). View answer →
-
Is calorie enough to break the cycle?
No. Protein, iron, sanitation and infection control decide whether the calorie stays in the child.
-
Does growth automatically end malnutrition?
Not if growth is unequal and the PDS remains cereal-heavy. Several richer States still show anaemia.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q16 · GS II · 15 marks
Inequality in the ownership pattern of resources is one of the major causes of poverty. Discuss in the context of 'paradox of poverty' -
2021 · Q8 · GS II · 10 marks
Can the vicious cycle of gender inequality, poverty and malnutrition be broken through microfinancing of women SHGs? Explain with examples. -
2019 · Q7 · GS II · 10 marks
There is a growing divergence in the relationship between poverty and hunger in India. The shrinking of social expenditure by the government is forcing the poor to spend more on Non- Food essential items squeezing their food - budget.- Elucidate. -
2018 · Q17 · GS II · 15 marks
How far do you agree with the view that the focus on lack of availability of food as the main cause of hunger takes the attention away from ineffective human development policies in India? (15). -
2017 · Q8 · GS II · 10 marks
Hunger and Poverty are the biggest challenges for good governance in India still today. Evaluate how far successive governments have progressed in dealing with these humongous problems. Suggest measures for improvement. -
2017 · Q17 · GS II · 15 marks
'Poverty Alleviation Programmes in India remain mere show pieces until and unless they are backed by political will'. Discuss with reference to the performance of the major poverty alleviation programmes in India. (250 words). -
2015 · Q13 · GS II · 12 marks
Though there have been several different estimates of poverty in India, all indicate reduction in poverty over time. Do you agree. Critically examine with reference to urban and rural poverty indicators.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2024 · GS II · 10 marks
Examine the need for electoral reforms as suggested by various committees, with particular reference to "one nation - one election" principle.
Indian Constitution
Tarkunde, Goswami, Law Commission 170/255 and the Election Commission have long asked for ceilings on party spend, faster petitions, and inner-party democracy. Candidate spend is capped; party spend is not, which is why money still dominates the poll. ADR disclosure and Lily Thomas reduced opacity and the conviction cushion; they did not end criminalisation. ONOE, as framed by the Kovind committee, promises one Model Code freeze, lower cost and less policy freeze. Federal cost: truncated Assemblies, President’s Rule risk, and nationalisation of State polls. Simultaneity is not a substitute for audited party finance and a statutory Code. Reform that works is a package, not a single polling date.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2024 · GS II · 10 marks
Explain and distinguish between Lok Adalats and Arbitration Tribunals. Whether they entertain civil as well as criminal cases?
Separation of Powers
Lok Adalat is a Legal Services Authorities Act forum: conciliation, award as a decree, generally no appeal. It hears civil matters and compoundable criminal cases, not non-compoundable crime. Arbitration is contractual under the 1996 Act: civil-commercial disputes, Section 34 challenge, no criminal trial. Booz Allen and Vidya Drolia mark what cannot be sent to a private tribunal. Permanent Lok Adalats for public utilities are a statutory hybrid, still not private arbitration. The working distinction is public compromise at little cost versus paid private adjudication.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2024 · GS II · 10 marks
"The growth of cabinet system has practkally resulted in the marginalisation of the parliamentary supremacy." Elucidate.
Parliament and State Legislatures
Articles 74–75 keep the Cabinet responsible to the Lok Sabha; that is the legal core of parliamentary government. Whips and the Tenth Schedule, ordinances and money-bill classification have moved real initiation to the Cabinet. This is practical marginalisation of the floor, not a legal repeal of Parliament. PAC, standing committees, Rajya Sabha and the floor test still bite. Keisham Meghachandra pressed Speakers to decide disqualification on a clock. A narrower anti-defection law would restore some of the supremacy the quote says is lost. The examiner’s misspelling does not change the demand: show practice squeezing text, not text dying.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.