Q8 · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2020 · GS I · 10 marks · 1 min read

← Q7 Q9 →

Has caste lost its relevance in understanding the multi- cultural Indian Society? Elaborate your answer with illustrations.

Topic: Social Empowerment, Communalism and Secularism. Syllabus: Social empowerment, communalism, regionalism and secularism. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2020 and Social Empowerment, Communalism and Secularism.

Revision summary

Caste no longer monopolises Indian social explanation. Srinivas showed mobility through Sanskritisation and dominant castes. Béteille saw class rise without the death of caste identity. Marriage, elections, and atrocities keep jati empirically alive. Multi-cultural India needs caste plus class, gender, and region.

Model answer

Introduction

Caste is no longer the only key to Indian society. It has not become a museum piece. M. N. Srinivas and André Béteille still help: ritual rank changed, inequality and identity did not vanish. Multi-cultural India is language, religion, region, class, and jati.

Body

What has weakened

  • Urban occupations, the Constitution, and reservations broke the old legal varna state. A software park does not display a village jajmani chart.
  • Srinivas’s Sanskritisation and dominant caste already showed mobility and politics, not a frozen Manu.
  • Inter-caste dining in cities, and class mixing in malls, make everyday caste less visible to the elite eye.

What remains relevant

  • Marriage is still largely endogamous. Matrimonial columns and apps filter jati even when the office does not.
  • Béteille argued that caste as a closed status system was yielding to class, yet caste as identity and network survived. Elections, khap disputes, and caste associations illustrate the second life.
  • Atrocities, manual scavenging, and campus exclusion show hierarchy as violence, not as a forgotten custom.
  • Multi-cultural claims of language and religion often sit on a caste base: a ‘Hindu’ or ‘Tamil’ public is still internally ranked.

Elaborate with the right answer

  • Caste has lost monopoly as the sole explanation. It has not lost relevance. Class, gender, and region must sit beside it, as Béteille insisted, without a premature obituary.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  OLD[Ritual hierarchy] --> W[Weaker in law and city jobs]
  ID[Endogamy vote atrocity] --> R[Still relevant]
  CL[Class region religion] --> M[Multi-cultural reading]
  R --> M

Conclusion

Caste is less total in law and office than in 1950. It remains a primary tool for marriage, vote, and humiliation. Multi-cultural India is misread if caste is declared irrelevant.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2022 · Q18 · GS I · 15 marks

    Analyze the salience of 'sect' in Indian society vis-a-vis caste, region and religion.

    View answer →

  2. 2022 · Q19 · GS I · 15 marks

    Are tolerance, assimilation and pluralism the key elements in the making of an Indian form of secularism? Justify your answer.

    View answer →

  3. 2020 · Q10 · GS I · 10 marks

    Do you agree that regionalism in India appears to be a consequence of rising cultural assertiveness? Argue.

    View answer →

  4. 2019 · Q10 · GS I · 10 marks

    What are the challenges to our cultural practices in the name of secularism?

    View answer →

  5. 2018 · Q8 · GS I · 10 marks

    "Caste system is assuming new identities and associational forms. Hence, caste system cannot be eradicated in India." Comment.

    View answer →

  6. 2018 · Q10 · GS I · 10 marks

    How the Indian concept of secularism different from the western model of secularism? Discuss.

    View answer →

  7. 2018 · Q20 · GS I · 15 marks

    'Communalism arises either due to power struggle or relative deprivation.' Argue by giving suitable illustrations.

    View answer →

  8. 2017 · Q19 · GS I · 15 marks

    Distinguish between religiousness/religiosity and communalism giving one example of how the former has got transformed into the latter in independent India. (250 words).

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1 · UPSC Mains 2020 · GS I · 10 marks

The rock-cut architecture represents one of the most important sources of our knowledge of early Indian art and history. Discuss.

Indian Heritage and Culture

Rock-cut work survives as dated sculpture, painting, and inscription. Ajanta keeps Vakataka murals and Buddhist narrative. Ellora shows Buddhist, Hindu, and Jain patronage on one hill, including Kailasa. Mahabalipuram records Pallava rathas and the turn to structural temples. The caves are a core source, though they under-represent ordinary life.

Q2 · UPSC Mains 2020 · GS I · 10 marks

Pala period is the most significant phase in the history of Buddhism in India. Enumerate.

Indian Heritage and Culture

Pala kings endowed Nalanda and raised Vikramshila and related mahaviharas. The phase matured Mahayana and Vajrayana when much of India had other royal cults. Pala bronze and manuscript painting set an eastern Buddhist style. Atisha carried this learning into Tibet. It is the last organised Indian Buddhist university age.

Q3 · UPSC Mains 2020 · GS I · 10 marks

Evaluate the policies of Lord Curzon and their long term implications on the national movements.

The Freedom Struggle

Curzon pursued efficient empire: frontier, municipal control, and universities. The 1904 Universities Act tightened official grip on campuses. The 1905 Partition of Bengal triggered Swadeshi, boycott, and Extremist politics. Reunion in 1911 did not erase communal and revolutionary afterlives. Long term, Curzon expanded the national movement more than he pacified it.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.