Revision summary
ITDPs are Tribal Sub-Plan area projects, often called ITDAs. Objectives were integrated poverty reduction, services, and resource protection. Schools, roads, and clinics expanded in many blocks. Xaxa recorded leakage and weak control over land and mining. FRA and PESA had to carry the resource objective that projects missed.
Model answer
Introduction
Integrated Tribal Development Projects are area programmes under the Tribal Sub-Plan that bundle welfare, infrastructure, and livelihoods in tribal blocks. The objective was to replace scattered schemes with one local command.
Body
Stated objectives
- After the Dhebar and later Shilu Ao reviews, the Tribal Sub-Plan (1970s) created ITDPs (often run as ITDAs) for blocks with high Scheduled Tribe shares.
- Objectives include reducing poverty, raising literacy and health, protecting land and forest access, and funding agriculture, irrigation, and roads in one pocket.
- Integration meant one project officer instead of leaking line departments. Fifth Schedule land rules and later PESA were supposed to sit beside the project, not against it.
What has been achieved
- Roads, schools, and primary health centres did expand in many ITDP blocks. Literacy and some farm schemes are visible.
- A local office gave Adivasi areas a bureaucratic address that the 1950s Community Development block often lacked, a gap S. C. Dube had already shown in village programmes.
Shortfalls
- The Xaxa Committee found leakage, contractor capture, and weak ST employment inside the project itself.
- Land alienation and mining continued in the same blocks. FRA, 2006 and Samata had to do land work that ITDP budgets did not.
- Integration on paper remained departmental in practice. Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups often stayed at the edge of the same project.
- Displacement from dams and mines reversed years of ITDP investment in the same catchment.
Reading
- ITDPs achieved infrastructure better than they achieved control over resources. That is half the original aim.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD TSP[Tribal Sub-Plan] --> I[ITDP ITDA] I --> S[Schools roads health] I --> F[Leakage land loss] FRA[FRA PESA] --> L[Resource rights]
Conclusion
ITDPs aimed at one-window tribal area development under the Sub-Plan. They built some services and failed to secure land, forest, and leakage-free livelihoods.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Compare the functioning of traditional Tribal Council with that of Gram Sabha under PESA
Next question in the 2022 paper (Q6). View answer →
-
Is an ITDP the same as a Fifth Schedule area?
No. ITDPs are development units. Scheduled Areas are a constitutional geography. They overlap but are not identical.
-
Did ITDPs replace PESA?
No. PESA is Gram Sabha law. ITDP is a project office. They can clash when the office ignores the sabha.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q7(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Critically examine how the displacement of tribal communities due to hydroelectric river dam projects has affected the women in local context. Illustrate with suitable ethnographic examples. -
2021 · Q6(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Discuss the impact of the Forest Rights Act (2006) on the livelihood and culture of tribal people in India -
2021 · Q7(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the problems involved in rehabilitation and resettlement of tribals displaced due to development projects in India -
2015 · Q7(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Recently non-government organizations have been critiqued for interfering with developmental process in tribal heartland ! Critically comment
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Pit-dwellers of Kashmir
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Pit-dwellers of Kashmir lived in sunken Neolithic floors at Burzahom, Gufkral, and Kanispur. Houses later rose on filled pits as mud-and-rubble rectangles. Bone tools, cereals, and dog burials mark mixed subsistence. Sankalia set the valley Neolithic beside other Indian food-producing cultures. The tradition is highland and local, not an Indus copy.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Varna and Buddhism
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Varna is the four-fold Brahmanical rank by birth. Buddhism treated it as a social label, not a bar to nirvana. The sangha was open by conduct, as Ashokan dhamma also implied. Patronage still carried rank into Buddhist society. Ambedkar used that critique in the 1956 conversion.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Dharma versus Religion
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Dharma means duty and order tied to role and group. Religion names a congregational faith with creed and conversion. Kane and Dumont keep dharma as law and hierarchy, not a church. Article 25 forces Indian practice into the legal word religion. Colonial translation flattened duty, sect, and civil law into one noun.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.