Revision summary
Majumdar built Lucknow tribal ethnography and teaching. Vidyarthi built Ranchi’s nature–man–spirit and sacred-complex models. Majumdar’s accent is contact, measurement, and the textbook. Vidyarthi’s accent is civilisation and eastern tribal cosmos. Both fed applied tribal study without being Elwin’s isolation pole.
Model answer
Introduction
D. N. Majumdar and L. P. Vidyarthi both made Indian tribes a university subject. One built Lucknow’s tribal sociology; the other built Ranchi’s sacred and nature models.
Body
D. N. Majumdar
- Fieldwork among Khasa, Ho, and others joined anthropometry, village, and change.
- He trained a generation at Lucknow and wrote textbooks that put tribe beside caste in Indian anthropology.
- The accent is culture contact, race questions of his day, and applied notes for administration.
L. P. Vidyarthi
- Ranchi school: nature–man–spirit complex for Maler and other eastern tribes, and sacred complex for Gaya as civilisation.
- He tied tribe to Indian civilisation, not only to a hill isolate, closer to Bose than to a zoo.
- Applied tribal development and Bihar fieldwork made Ranchi a policy address.
Comparison
- Majumdar is the earlier all-India teacher-ethnographer. Vidyarthi is the conceptual modeller of tribe and tirtha.
- Both accepted contact. Vidyarthi’s complexes are more portable exam tools.
- Neither is Elwin the protectionist pole, but both fed planning files.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD M[Majumdar Lucknow] --> T[Tribe contact textbooks] V[Vidyarthi Ranchi] --> N[Nature-man-spirit] V --> S[Sacred complex]
Conclusion
Majumdar institutionalised tribal study in north Indian anthropology. Vidyarthi gave it the nature–man–spirit and sacred-complex frames still used to read eastern tribes and Hindu centres together.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
The role that regionalism plays in demand for autonomy among Indian tribes
Next question in the 2016 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Who is more theoretical?
Vidyarthi’s named complexes travel farther in exams. Majumdar’s gift is the institutional field school.
-
Did they study the same tribes?
Overlap is limited. Majumdar’s Himalayan and Ho files differ from Vidyarthi’s Chotanagpur–Gaya axis.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2021 · Q1(d) · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Caste and social capital -
2021 · Q4(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the role of Panchayati Raj Institutions in transforming traditional power hierarchy in rural India -
2021 · Q8(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Examine how structural transformation in economy is affecting traditional social relationships in agrarian society -
2016 · Q3(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Describe the traditional patterns of settlement of Indian villages -
2016 · Q6(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Explain Indian village as a social system with suitable examples -
2015 · Q6(a) · Anthropology GS 2 · 20 marks
Examine the contribution of village studies towards the understanding of Indian social system -
2015 · Q6(b) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the impact of globalization on village economy in India -
2015 · Q7(c) · Anthropology GS 2 · 15 marks
Discuss the contribution of M. N. Srinivas to the study of Indian society. Examine the influence of British social anthropologists on his ideas
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Significance of Mesolithic findings from Belan Valley
Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization
Belan Valley Mesolithic sites include Chopani-Mando, Mahadaha, and Sarai Nahar Rai. Microliths, bone, burial, and wild plant traces mark late foragers. Nearby Koldihwa ties the valley to early rice and cattle experiments. Sankalia set the belt in India’s prehistoric sequence. The significance is a North Indian hunt-to-farm bridge.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Linguistic elements in Indian population
Demographic profile of India
Indian languages group mainly as Indo-Aryan, Dravidian, Austroasiatic, and Tibeto-Burman. Grierson mapped that skeleton; the Eighth Schedule ranks some tongues. Families do not equal Risley’s races. Tribes speak all four families. Unscheduled languages still need Article 29 and 350A.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks
Relevance of caste in contemporary Indian politics
Emergence, growth and development of Anthropology in India
Caste organises booths, tickets, and reservation blocs. Srinivas’s dominant caste still explains many rural seats. Bailey treated caste teams as political machines. Class and communal crises can cut across jati, then caste returns. Contemporary politics uses caste as arithmetic more than as shastra.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.