Q5(e) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks · 1 min read

← Q5 Q6 →

Anthropological interpretation of ethnic and political movements.

Topic: Contributions of anthropology to the understanding of regionalism, communalism and ethnic and political movements.. Syllabus: 9.3 Contributions of anthropology to the understanding of regionalism, communalism and ethnic and political movements. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2016 and Contributions of anthropology to the understanding of regionalism, communalism and ethnic and political movements..

Revision summary

Anthropology treats movements as organised identity plus grievance. Village faction, tribe, and language are Indian building blocks. Elwin and Haimendorf tied tribal politics to land. Communalism is a religious ethnicisation of the same process. The task is to analyse leadership and resource, not to bless the slogan.

Model answer

Introduction

Anthropology reads ethnic and political movements as organised identity, not as sudden madness. In India they draw on tribe, language, caste, and region.

Body

How anthropologists read them

  • Bailey and Srinivas showed village factions becoming party and ethnic blocs.
  • Tribal movements are often land and forest claims dressed as peoplehood, as Elwin and Haimendorf documented.
  • Language movements that made states in 1956 are ethnic politics with a Grierson map.

Interpretation, not apology

  • Movements can be democratic autonomy or exclusionary sons-of-the-soil.
  • Communalism is the religious form of the same ethnicisation of the roll.
  • The method is to track leadership, myth, and resource, not to take the slogan as history.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  M[Movements] --> I[Identity myth]
  M --> R[Land language jobs]
  A[Anthropology] --> M

Conclusion

Anthropological interpretation treats ethnic and political movements as social organisation of identity and grievance. In India the usual fuels are land, language, and rank.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Explain Indian village as a social system with suitable examples

    Next question in the 2016 paper (Q6). View answer →

  • Are all ethnic movements tribal?

    No. Caste and language movements are ethnic too in the wide sense.

  • Does interpretation mean support?

    It means explanation. Policy still judges violence and exclusion.

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

Significance of Mesolithic findings from Belan Valley

Evolution of the Indian Culture and Civilization

Belan Valley Mesolithic sites include Chopani-Mando, Mahadaha, and Sarai Nahar Rai. Microliths, bone, burial, and wild plant traces mark late foragers. Nearby Koldihwa ties the valley to early rice and cattle experiments. Sankalia set the belt in India’s prehistoric sequence. The significance is a North Indian hunt-to-farm bridge.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

Linguistic elements in Indian population

Demographic profile of India

Indian languages group mainly as Indo-Aryan, Dravidian, Austroasiatic, and Tibeto-Burman. Grierson mapped that skeleton; the Eighth Schedule ranks some tongues. Families do not equal Risley’s races. Tribes speak all four families. Unscheduled languages still need Article 29 and 350A.

Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2016 · Anthropology GS 2 · 10 marks

Relevance of caste in contemporary Indian politics

Emergence, growth and development of Anthropology in India

Caste organises booths, tickets, and reservation blocs. Srinivas’s dominant caste still explains many rural seats. Bailey treated caste teams as political machines. Class and communal crises can cut across jati, then caste returns. Contemporary politics uses caste as arithmetic more than as shastra.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.