Q4(a) · UPSC Civil Services Mains 2022 · Anthropology GS 1 · 20 marks · 1 min read

← Q3 Q4 →

Why Heath and Carter used anthropometric measurements instead of photographs of an individual to assess the somatotype? Elaborate their method

Topic: Ageing and senescence. Theories and observations. Syllabus: Ageing and senescence. Theories and observations—biological and chronological longevity. Human physique and somatotypes. Methodologies for growth studies. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2022 and Ageing and senescence. Theories and observations.

Revision summary

Sheldon’s photoscopic somatotype depended on nude pictures and rater eye. Heath and Carter used skinfolds, girths, bone breadths, height, and weight. Three components are calculated, not guessed from a print. The method fits sports and growth surveys. It describes present shape, not race or temperament.

Model answer

Introduction

William Sheldon photographed bodies and scored endomorphy, mesomorphy, and ectomorphy by eye. Heath and Carter replaced the photograph with callipers and a formula so that somatotype could be repeated in the field.

Body

Why not photographs

  • Sheldon’s atlas needed posed nudes and a trained rater. Bias, privacy, and poor repeatability followed, which Hooton and later sports scientists criticised.
  • A photo cannot give true girths or skinfolds. Camera distance and posture change the apparent type.
  • Anthropology in schools, armies, and villages cannot run a nude photo studio. Heath and Carter (1967 onward) needed a method that works with tape, stadiometer, and skinfold calliper.

The Heath–Carter method

  • Ten measurements are standard: height, weight, four skinfolds, two bone breadths, and two limb girths.
  • Three components are calculated: endomorphy from skinfolds, mesomorphy from bone and girth corrected for height, ectomorphy from height-weight ratio.
  • The result is a three-number somatotype plotted on a somatochart. A wrestler and a distance runner separate without a photograph.
  • Carter applied it to Olympic athletes. Indian physical anthropologists used it in growth and sports selection studies.

Limit

  • Somatotype is a shape index, not a race or a character type. Sheldon’s temperament claims are dropped.
  • Fat and muscle change with training and diet, so the score is a present body, not a destiny.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  SH[Sheldon photo rating] --> B[Bias privacy]
  HC[Heath Carter] --> M[Skinfold girth bone height]
  M --> SC[Somatochart 3 numbers]

Conclusion

Heath and Carter left the photograph because it was unethical, unrepeatable, and metrically weak. Their anthropometry turns somatotype into a field measurement of shape, not a moral portrait.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2021 · Q8(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 15 marks

    Discuss the physiological and evolutionary theories of aging

    View answer →

  2. 2015 · Q7(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 20 marks

    What is an anthropometric somatotype? Describe Heath and Carter's method of somatotyping

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

Debate between formalist and substantivist approaches

Economic Organization

Formalists treat scarcity and choice as universal. Substantivists, after Polanyi, treat reciprocity, redistribution, and market as historical forms. Kula and Nuer cattle show goods locked in kinship and prestige. Spheres of exchange refuse one money. Use both tools: calculation inside an instituted process.

Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

Mesolithic rock art in Indian subcontinent

Mesolithic

Mesolithic paintings sit on Indian sandstone and granite shelters. Bhimbetka, recorded by Wakankar, is the central cluster. Scenes show hunt, dance, and early animal management. Microlith floors tie the pictures to a foraging economy. The art is ritual and record, not a later doodle.

Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks

Radcliffe-Brown's ideas on status, role and institution

Functionalism (Malinowski)

Status is a recognised position in social structure. Role is the rights and duties of that position. Institution is the standardised behaviour that holds statuses together. Andaman and Australian fieldwork supplied the cases. The triad is useful if conflict and history are not treated as noise.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.