Revision summary
Microliths are tools; domestication is a faunal and dung argument. Bagor shows sheep and goat with a microlithic camp. Adamgarh and Bhimbetka mix hunt with later stock. Ganga Mesolithic bone is still largely wild. Harappan villages complete the domestication story.
Model answer
Introduction
Indian microlithic sites are mainly Mesolithic. Some of them already show managed animals beside hunt. The evidence is bone, dung, and settlement, not the bladelet alone.
Body
What counts as evidence
- A microlith is a small backed tool. Domestication needs age-sex profiles of fauna, pathology, dung, and a shift from wild size-ranges.
- Bagor (Rajasthan), excavated by V. N. Misra, yielded sheep and goat with microliths and copper in later levels, a pastoral overlay on a hunting camp.
- Adamgarh and Bhimbetka shelters mix hunted deer and boar with later herded stock in the sequence.
- Sarai Nahar Rai, Mahadaha, and Damdama in the Ganga plains show wild cattle, hog deer, and turtle. Claims of early cattle must stay cautious where bones are wild aurochs-size.
- Langhnaj in Gujarat and Birbhanpur add microliths with fauna that later Holocene villages clearly herd.
Reading the phase
- Meadow and Harappan work show full domestication in the Indus tradition. Microlithic India is a mosaic: foragers, herder-foragers, and contact with village stock.
- Rock art of herding at Bhimbetka supports the bone, but art alone is not a domestication date.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD MIC[Microlith sites] --> B[Bagor sheep goat] MIC --> S[Shelters Adamgarh Bhimbetka] MIC --> G[Ganga Mesolithic wild heavy]
Conclusion
Animal domestication in the Indian microlithic is patchy. Bagor sheep-goat and shelter sequences are the strongest field files. The bladelet industry does not by itself prove a herd.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Should we still distinguish between 'classic' and 'progressive' Neanderthals? Discuss the controversy surrounding Neanderthal's position in human evolution
Next question in the 2022 paper (Q3). View answer →
-
Did all Mesolithic Indians herd?
No. Many sites remain hunter-gatherer. Domestication is regional and late in the microlithic span.
-
Is a small bovid bone enough?
No. Size overlap with wild sheep and goat needs measurements, age profiles, and context.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q5(a) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Multispecies, Multi-sited and Critical Ethnography. -
2024 · Q1(b) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Harappan maritime trade -
2021 · Q5(e) · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Modes of Subsistence.
More from this paper
Q1(a) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Debate between formalist and substantivist approaches
Economic Organization
Formalists treat scarcity and choice as universal. Substantivists, after Polanyi, treat reciprocity, redistribution, and market as historical forms. Kula and Nuer cattle show goods locked in kinship and prestige. Spheres of exchange refuse one money. Use both tools: calculation inside an instituted process.
Q1(b) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Mesolithic rock art in Indian subcontinent
Mesolithic
Mesolithic paintings sit on Indian sandstone and granite shelters. Bhimbetka, recorded by Wakankar, is the central cluster. Scenes show hunt, dance, and early animal management. Microlith floors tie the pictures to a foraging economy. The art is ritual and record, not a later doodle.
Q1(c) · UPSC Mains 2022 · Anthropology GS 1 · 10 marks
Radcliffe-Brown's ideas on status, role and institution
Functionalism (Malinowski)
Status is a recognised position in social structure. Role is the rights and duties of that position. Institution is the standardised behaviour that holds statuses together. Andaman and Australian fieldwork supplied the cases. The triad is useful if conflict and history are not treated as noise.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.