Revision summary
UP’s 1947 Panchayat Raj Act makes the “long” claim historically true. The 73rd Amendment three tiers, SEC, and SFC are the constitutional success layer. Gram panchayats deliver MGNREGA, PMAY-G, sanitation, and tied grants. Fifty per cent women’s reservation is a democratic example, despite proxy chairs. Do not invent non-UP model villages; name UP instruments and their limits.
Model answer
Introduction
Uttar Pradesh wrote an early Panchayat Raj Act in 1947 and then fitted the 73rd Amendment’s three tiers—gram, kshetra, and zila. The statement is corroborable if “success” means long legal life, women’s seats, and delivery through the gram sabha, not a claim that every pradhan is autonomous.
Body
Long arc, which is itself a story
- The U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947, gave village panchayats a statutory life decades before the 73rd Amendment, so “long” is historically fair.
- After 1992–93 the State aligned gram panchayat, kshetra panchayat, and zila panchayat with Part IX, a State Election Commission, and a State Finance Commission.
- Continuity of elections, however delayed at times, has made the pradhan and ward member ordinary rural offices, not a one-year experiment.
Examples that corroborate delivery
- Sanitation and water campaigns reached villages through gram panchayats: toilet construction, soak pits, and jal-jeevan tap lists are panchayat files, not only Lucknow advertisements.
- MGNREGA job cards, works, and social audits run on the gram panchayat; Bundelkhand ponds and flood-plain earthworks are typical UP examples of that stack.
- Housing (PMAY-Gramin) and 15th Finance Commission tied grants use the panchayat as the last-mile account, which is institutional success even when quality varies.
- e-Panchayat, GPDP planning, and SVAMITVA property cards in many districts show a digital turn on the 1947 base.
- Women’s reservation, raised to one-half of seats in UP local bodies, has produced a large cohort of women pradhans; that is a democratic success story even where “pradhan-pati” remains a social drag.
Social and civic examples
- Nyaya panchayat memory and today’s conciliation at village meetings still settle petty disputes cheaper than the district court.
- ODF declarations, school-boundary walls, and midday-meal monitoring committees are mundane successes that add up across seventy-five districts.
Corroboration with a check
- Capture by dominant castes, delayed elections, and proxy women chairs are failures inside the same system.
- They do not erase the long legal story or the examples above; they warn that corroboration is not eulogy.
- Suitable examples are therefore 1947 Act continuity, three-tier polls, MGNREGA–PMAY–JJM files, women’s seats, and e-GPDP—not borrowed Maharashtra “model villages” passed off as UP.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD A[1947 UP Panchayat Act] --> T[Three tiers Part IX] T --> W[Women seats] T --> D[MGNREGA PMAY JJM] T --> E[eGPDP SVAMITVA] X[Proxy caste delay] --> T
Conclusion
The statement holds if illustrated by UP’s 1947 panchayat law, Part IX three tiers, women’s reservation, and last-mile schemes on the gram panchayat. Those are long success stories. Proxy politics and caste capture are the remaining unpaid bill, not a reason to deny the record.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Discuss the role of Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission and explain the challenges before it for independent and impartial selection of public servants.
Next question in the 2024 paper (Q17). View answer →
-
Does corroboration mean there is no failure?
No. Caste capture and proxy pradhans exist. The long legal and delivery stories still stand as examples.
-
Can Hiware Bazar be used as a UP example?
No. It is Maharashtra. Use UP’s 1947 Act, three tiers, and scheme files.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2023 · Q3 · UPGS5 · 8 marks
Describe the major stages in the formulation of Gram Panchayat Development Plan (GPDP) in Uttar Pradesh. -
2023 · Q13 · UPGS5 · 12 marks
Throw light on the e-District Project of Uttar Pradesh government. Is it a good initiative in the direction of E-governance in Uttar Pradesh? Examine.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2024 · UPGS5 · 8 marks
Describe the cultural significance of 'Prayagraj' in ancient India.
UP history, civilisation and culture
Ancient Prayaga is the Ganga–Yamuna sangam in today’s Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh. Puranic mahatmya and the Mahabharata make it a moksha tirtha with the Akshayavat. Kaushambi and the Ashokan pillar tie the belt to Magadha and Vatsa power. Xuanzang records Harsha’s gift-assemblies at the confluence. The site is a shared sacred and royal landscape, not only a later city name.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2024 · UPGS5 · 8 marks
Write about the major republics located in Uttar Pradesh and their political system in the 6th century B.C.
Political system of UP
Sixth-century UP had ganas and kingdoms on the same Ganga–tarai map. Shakyas of Piprahwa–Kapilavastu and Mallas of Kushinagar are the main republics on UP soil. Koliyas and Moriyas were smaller neighbour sanghas. The system was a kshatriya parishad with a ganamukhya, debate, and limited voting. Kashi, Kosala, and Vatsa were monarchies and must be kept apart.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2024 · UPGS5 · 8 marks
What was the policy of the British Government towards the Taluqdars of Awadh after the Revolt of 1857?
UP in the freedom struggle
Annexation in 1856 and the summary settlement had pushed Awadh taluqdars into 1857. After the revolt Britain restored them with sanads as estate proprietors. The Oudh Estates Act, 1869, hardened landlord title and succession. Taluqdars became the rural allies of Crown rule around Lucknow. Peasants lost the occupancy tilt of the pre-revolt settlement.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.