Q5 · UPPSC PCS Mains 2024 · GS V (UP) · 8 marks · ~125 words in the hall · 2 min read

← Q4 Q6 →

Distinguish between the Consolidated Fund and the Contingency Fund of the State of Uttar Pradesh.

Topic: Public service and constitutional bodies in UP. Syllabus: Public Service, Public Service Commission, Auditing, Advocate General, High Court and its jurisdiction in UP. Special State Selection Criteria, Official Language, Consolidated Fund and Contingency Fund, Political Parties and State Election Commission of UP. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2024 and Public service and constitutional bodies in UP.

Revision summary

Article 266 places UP revenues and loans in the Consolidated Fund. Spending from it needs Vidhan appropriation except for charged items in their special form. Article 267(2) creates a Contingency Fund as a Governor-held imprest. Unforeseen outlay is advanced, then recouped by supplementary grant. The two funds must not be treated as interchangeable cash boxes.

Model answer

Introduction

The Constitution gives every State, including Uttar Pradesh, two distinct pots of public money. The distinction is legal, not a mere accounting nickname: one fund is the house of voted expenditure, the other is an imprest for surprise.

Body

Consolidated Fund of the State

  • Article 266(1) puts all State revenues, loans raised by the State, and loan recoveries into the Consolidated Fund of Uttar Pradesh.
  • No money leaves that fund except under appropriation by the Uttar Pradesh Legislature, through the annual, supplementary, or excess grants that become the Appropriation Act (Articles 202–206).
  • Charged items such as the Governor’s and High Court judges’ salaries still sit on this fund, but they are not voted in the same way as demanded grants.
  • Day-to-day treasuries at Lucknow and the districts only pay what the Appropriation Act has already opened.

Contingency Fund of the State

  • Article 267(2) allows a Contingency Fund of the State, placed at the disposal of the Governor of Uttar Pradesh, for unforeseen expenditure pending authorisation by the Legislature.
  • The corpus is an imprest created by a State Act; advances are made, then recouped by a supplementary grant from the Consolidated Fund, so the imprest is restored.
  • It is not a second budget. Flood relief in the tarai, a sudden law-and-order deployment, or an epidemic purchase can be met at once, then brought to the Vidhan Sabha.

Distinction

  • Consolidated Fund is the ocean of voted and charged State finance; Contingency Fund is a small, Governor-held bridge until the House catches up.
  • Mixing the two would either freeze emergencies or spend without legislature control—both unconstitutional for Uttar Pradesh as for any other State.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  Rev[State revenues loans] --> CF[Consolidated Fund UP]
  CF --> Leg[Vidhan appropriation]
  Imp[Imprest Act] --> Cont[Contingency Fund]
  Gov[Governor UP] --> Cont
  Cont --> Unf[Unforeseen spend]
  Unf --> Rec[Recoup from CF]

Conclusion

The Consolidated Fund of Uttar Pradesh holds all regular receipts and can be spent only after legislative appropriation. The Contingency Fund is a Governor-held imprest for unforeseen outlay, later recouped from that same Consolidated Fund.

Quick related

Students also ask

  • Discuss the composition and jurisdiction of the State High Court of Uttar Pradesh.

    Next question in the 2024 paper (Q6). View answer →

  • Can the Contingency Fund replace the budget?

    No. It is a temporary imprest. The Vidhan Sabha must later regularise the spend from the Consolidated Fund.

  • Who controls each fund?

    The Legislature controls the Consolidated Fund through appropriation. The Governor holds the Contingency Fund as imprest, not as a private purse.

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2025 · Q6 · UPGS5 · 8 marks

    Discuss the jurisdiction of Allahabad High Court and its role in upholding Constitutional values.

    View answer →

  2. 2025 · Q17 · UPGS5 · 12 marks

    "Citizen Charter should be of the Citizen, by the Citizen and for the Citizen." Discuss with special reference to Uttar Pradesh.

    View answer →

  3. 2024 · Q6 · UPGS5 · 8 marks

    Discuss the composition and jurisdiction of the State High Court of Uttar Pradesh.

    View answer →

  4. 2024 · Q17 · UPGS5 · 12 marks

    Discuss the role of Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission and explain the challenges before it for independent and impartial selection of public servants.

    View answer →

  5. 2023 · Q1 · UPGS5 · 8 marks

    Critically examine the process of appointment of the Advocate General and his functions in Uttar Pradesh.

    View answer →

  6. 2023 · Q2 · UPGS5 · 8 marks

    Discuss the nature of regional parties in Uttar Pradesh. Throw light on their importance in the politics of the state.

    View answer →

  7. 2023 · Q15 · UPGS5 · 12 marks

    Describe the role of Uttar Pradesh Police ‘Special Task Force’ in the prevention of organised crime.

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1 · UPSC Mains 2024 · UPGS5 · 8 marks

Describe the cultural significance of 'Prayagraj' in ancient India.

UP history, civilisation and culture

Ancient Prayaga is the Ganga–Yamuna sangam in today’s Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh. Puranic mahatmya and the Mahabharata make it a moksha tirtha with the Akshayavat. Kaushambi and the Ashokan pillar tie the belt to Magadha and Vatsa power. Xuanzang records Harsha’s gift-assemblies at the confluence. The site is a shared sacred and royal landscape, not only a later city name.

Q2 · UPSC Mains 2024 · UPGS5 · 8 marks

Write about the major republics located in Uttar Pradesh and their political system in the 6th century B.C.

Political system of UP

Sixth-century UP had ganas and kingdoms on the same Ganga–tarai map. Shakyas of Piprahwa–Kapilavastu and Mallas of Kushinagar are the main republics on UP soil. Koliyas and Moriyas were smaller neighbour sanghas. The system was a kshatriya parishad with a ganamukhya, debate, and limited voting. Kashi, Kosala, and Vatsa were monarchies and must be kept apart.

Q3 · UPSC Mains 2024 · UPGS5 · 8 marks

What was the policy of the British Government towards the Taluqdars of Awadh after the Revolt of 1857?

UP in the freedom struggle

Annexation in 1856 and the summary settlement had pushed Awadh taluqdars into 1857. After the revolt Britain restored them with sanads as estate proprietors. The Oudh Estates Act, 1869, hardened landlord title and succession. Taluqdars became the rural allies of Crown rule around Lucknow. Peasants lost the occupancy tilt of the pre-revolt settlement.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.