Revision summary
Preventing violence is lawful; ‘teach them a lesson’ is an ambiguous extra-legal hint. The SP failed ethical command by mixing duty with deniable cruelty. The official’s beating after a quarrel is assault, not crowd control. Superior orders do not excuse an illegal blow. Both owe inquiry, aid to the victim, and an end to oral ‘lesson’ culture.
Model answer
Introduction
A peaceful protest is a constitutional liberty, not a licence for a beating. The Superintendent’s extra line, and the constable’s blow, both fail the ethics of a uniformed power that must stay inside the law.
Body
The Superintendent of Police
- The first instruction — prevent violence — is a lawful duty of public order. The second — ‘teach them a lesson’ if the situation warrants — is an unethical dual message.
- ‘Teach a lesson’ in police speech commonly means extra-legal pain. It invites the subordinate to read violence as permission, while the superior keeps deniability.
- Ethical command is clear, written where needed, and limited to lawful force under the Criminal Procedure Code and police manuals. Ambiguous oral threat is a failure of leadership.
- The SP owed the traders a duty of equal protection. A peaceful dharna is not an enemy unit. Mixing prevention with punishment-by-humiliation violates Article 21 and the spirit of Article 19.
- After the beating, ethics required a prompt inquiry, medical aid, and a speaking order — not hiding behind the phrase ‘if situation warrants’.
The police official on duty
- Argument followed by beating a protester is personal anger in uniform, not crowd control. It is assault, and it treats the citizen as a body to be corrected.
- Superior orders are not a moral or legal shield for an illegal blow. Each officer remains a moral agent and a servant of the law, not of a wink.
- If violence had truly begun, the official still had graded, recorded force and arrest — not a lesson taught in a quarrel.
- Honesty after the act would have been a true report. Blaming the SP while owning the fist is cowardice dressed as obedience.
Joint failure
- The SP created a climate of condoned cruelty; the official converted it into a bruise. Both broke the trust that police power is public, not private revenge.
- Remedy is independent inquiry, departmental action, and a standing rule that oral ‘lesson’ talk is itself misconduct.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD P[Peaceful protest] --> L[Lawful prevent-violence duty] S[Teach a lesson] --> V[Unethical licence] V --> B[Beating] B --> F[Both fail public trust]
Conclusion
The SP’s ‘teach them a lesson’ was an unethical, deniable licence for extra-legal force. The official’s beating of a peaceful protester was a personal crime in khaki. Obedience does not wash either hand.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Define attitude in historical perspective and discuss the relationship between aptitude and attitude.
Next question in the 2021 paper (Q6). View answer →
-
Could the official refuse the SP?
Yes. An illegal oral hint may be met with a request for written, lawful orders. A beating is never the ethical reading of ‘if needed’.
-
Does a protest lose protection if it turns noisy?
Noise is not a licence to assault. Dispersal, if lawful, still follows procedure and proportionality.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2022 · Q7 · UPGS4 · 8 marks
Do you accept that public institutions are successful in preservation of the rights of people? -
2022 · Q15 · UPGS4 · 12 marks
Crowd is a temporary group which immediately collects at one place in a situation of accident or protest or demonstration. The probability of this crowd becoming violent is always possible. Many times this crowd creates unnecessary situations of violence. Through which persuasion method can the crowd be controlled and satisfied? Explain. -
2021 · Q1 · UPGS4 · 8 marks
Does individual morality have a bearing effect on the decision of public life? -
2021 · Q7 · UPGS4 · 8 marks
Define empathy and discuss the role of empathy in solving problems of weaker section. -
2021 · Q12 · UPGS4 · 12 marks
What are the ethical perversions of private sector? Describe the three options of ethical life. -
2020 · Q8 · UPGS4 · 8 marks
Differentiate between the following. -
2020 · Q16 · UPGS4 · 12 marks
Anger is a harmful negative emotion, it is injurious to both the personal life and the work life. How can it be controlled? Explain. -
2020 · Q17 · UPGS4 · 12 marks
"It is said that government servants take bribe because people offer bribe to them. If people stop offering bribe, the problem of bribe will be solved." What is your opinion about the statement? Examine critically.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2021 · UPGS4 · 8 marks
Does individual morality have a bearing effect on the decision of public life?
Ethics and Human Interface
Public decisions are signed by persons, so private honesty and restraint shape the file. Integrity is a personal virtue that must appear as a speaking order, not as a slogan. Private creed may not replace equality, impersonality, or statute. Conduct rules punish the private vice that enters the noting. When conscience and duty clash, recusal or resignation is honest; a secret veto is not.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2021 · UPGS4 · 8 marks
What are the essential virtues which are responsible for an ideal human ethical behaviour according to Mahatma Gandhi? Discuss.
Moral thinkers and philosophers
Gandhi’s ethics is a daily vow, not a speech. Satya, ahimsa, asteya, aparigraha, restraint, and fearlessness are the core. Labour, swadeshi, equal respect for faiths, and the end of untouchability complete the public face. The vows work as one: greed or fear breaks the rest. For a civil servant they mean a truthful noting and non-injury under statute, not a pulpit.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2021 · UPGS4 · 8 marks
‘Corruption causes misuse of government treasury, administrative inefficiency and obstruction in national development.’ Give suggestions for prevention of corruption in public life in the context of the statement given.
Probity in Governance
Corruption misuses public money, slows honest work, and turns schemes into rent. Prevention cuts discretion through published rules, e-office, and speaking orders. RTI, social audit, DBT, and asset disclosure shrink the dark market. Vigilance and whistle-blower protection must not punish the complainant. Appraisal should reward a reasoned refusal, and political funding must not sell the file from above.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.