Q18 · UPPSC PCS Mains 2024 · GS II · 12 marks · ~200 words in the hall · 3 min read

← Q17 Q19 →

Examine the major issues of dispute between India and Bangladesh and give suggestions for improving bilateral relations.

Topic: Bilateral, regional and global groupings. Syllabus: Bilateral, regional and Global groupings and agreements involving India. Same official PYQ from year-wise 2024 and Bilateral, regional and global groupings.

Revision summary

Teesta sharing is the central unresolved water dispute; the 1996 Ganga treaty is the contrast success. Border firing, smuggling, and cattle trade remain human-security files. NRC and CAA are domestic Indian law with bilateral political fallout in Dhaka. Indian export surplus and non-tariff barriers feed a trade grievance. China’s role and the 2024 Dhaka transition are strategic overlays. Suggestions: interim Teesta, safer border, trade access, and regime-proof connectivity.

Model answer

Introduction

India and Bangladesh share a 4,000-kilometre land border, 54 transboundary rivers, and a packed history from 1971. Disputes sit beside dense cooperation on power, transit, and the 2015 Land Boundary Agreement. An examination must name the live files — Teesta, border management, migration politics, and trade imbalance — and then suggest work that a neighbour, not a slogan, can do.

Body

Major disputes

  • Teesta water sharing is the most named river dispute: a draft allocation has repeatedly stalled on India’s federal politics, especially West Bengal’s irrigation and ecological concerns, while Dhaka treats delay as a trust deficit.
  • Other waters — Ganga (Farakka treaty 1996 is the success story), Kushiyara, Feni, and fears around upstream projects such as Tipaimukh — keep the Joint Rivers Commission busy without a basin-wide settlement.
  • Border management: fencing, cattle trade, smuggling, and deaths of civilians at the International Border remain a human-security dispute even after coordinated patrols.
  • Migration, the National Register of Citizens in Assam, and the Citizenship Amendment Act are read in Dhaka as identity pressure on Muslims of East Bengali origin; New Delhi reads the same files as domestic citizenship and illegal-migration control.
  • Trade is lopsided toward Indian exports; non-tariff barriers, port delays, and limited Bangladeshi market access in India feed a commercial grievance.
  • Security leftovers — Northeast insurgent sanctuaries, later largely squeezed — and China’s growing infrastructure and defence footprint in Bangladesh are strategic disputes by another name.
  • The 2024 political change in Dhaka after Sheikh Hasina’s exit added a new layer: minority safety, the future of defence and connectivity pacts, and the politics of refuge in India.

What is not a dispute

  • The 2015 Land Boundary Agreement and exchange of enclaves, maritime delimitation after the 2014 award, and electricity trade are settled or working files and should not be dumped into the dispute list.

Suggestions

  • Close an interim Teesta formula with a West Bengal–Union–Dhaka table, plus data sharing and a dry-season augmentation project, rather than waiting for a perfect basin treaty.
  • Professionalise the border: more coordinated patrols, cameras, joint investigation of firing, and border haats so cattle and petty trade leave the lethal grey zone.
  • Keep citizenship law and NRC as India’s domestic process, but run a quiet diplomatic track so Dhaka is not surprised into anti-India populism.
  • Rebalance trade with easier access for Bangladeshi garments and agro-goods, faster Integrated Check Posts, and rupee–taka settlement where useful.
  • Protect 1971-era people-to-people capital: visas, students, power grid, rail (Akhaura–Agartala), and IMT/BBIN transit even when governments change.
  • Compete with extra-regional influence by being the reliable first responder on disaster, energy, and currency support, not by vetoing Dhaka’s other friendships.

Flow diagram

flowchart TD
  T[Teesta and rivers] --> D[Disputes]
  B[Border and migration] --> D
  TR[Trade imbalance] --> D
  S[Interim water deal] --> I[Improved ties]
  P[Professional border] --> I
  C[Connectivity and trade access] --> I

Conclusion

The major disputes are Teesta and other rivers, a hard border, migration-and-citizenship politics, trade imbalance, and strategic crowding. Relations improve when water gets an interim deal, the border is made less lethal, trade is rebalanced, and connectivity is insulated from regime change — the method of 2015, applied to the files that 2015 left open.

Quick related

Students also ask

PYQ trend

When UPSC asked this

Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.

  1. 2025 · Q10 · UPGS2 · 8 marks

    Assess the strategic significance of the 25th Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) Summit, 2025 Declaration, in endorsing India's long-standing position on cross-border terrorism.

    View answer →

  2. 2025 · Q20 · UPGS2 · 12 marks

    To what extent can India's Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) with various countries help mitigate the adverse effects of the US trade policies on India's exports? Critically evaluate.

    View answer →

  3. 2024 · Q10 · UPGS2 · 8 marks

    Discuss India's regional policy towards South-East Asia.

    View answer →

  4. 2023 · Q8 · UPGS2 · 8 marks

    The failure of SAARC forced India to strengthen BIMSTEC. Explain.

    View answer →

  5. 2023 · Q9 · UPGS2 · 8 marks

    Explain the rationale behind India’s involvement in QUAD.

    View answer →

  6. 2019 · Q4 · UPGS2 · 8 marks

    What are the main irritants in Indo-Nepal bilateral relations?

    View answer →

More from this paper

Q1 · UPSC Mains 2024 · UPGS2 · 8 marks

Write a short note on the composition of the Constituent Assembly.

Indian Constitution

The Cabinet Mission Plan, 1946, designed an indirectly elected Constituent Assembly. Provincial assemblies chose 296 British-India seats by STV; princely states nominated 93. Original strength 389 fell to 299 after Partition. Dr Rajendra Prasad presided; Dr Ambedkar chaired the Drafting Committee. That elite college still claimed popular authority through the Objective Resolution.

Q2 · UPSC Mains 2024 · UPGS2 · 8 marks

Write the role of NITI Aayog in the development of India.

Government policies for development

NITI Aayog replaced the Planning Commission on 1 January 2015 as a Union think tank. The Prime Minister chairs it; Chief Ministers sit on the Governing Council. It does not allocate Plan funds; the Budget and Finance Commission do fiscal federalism. Aspirational Districts, SDG India Index, and Atal Innovation Mission are its main development tools. Impact depends on State and ministry action, not on a NITI cheque.

Q3 · UPSC Mains 2024 · UPGS2 · 8 marks

What are the special legislative powers of the Council of States (Rajya Sabha)? Discuss.

Union and the States

Article 249 lets Rajya Sabha by a two-thirds resolution authorise Parliament to legislate on a State List matter in the national interest. Article 312 uses the same two-thirds key for new All-India Services. If Lok Sabha is dissolved, Rajya Sabha can still approve emergency proclamations. On Money Bills Rajya Sabha only recommends for fourteen days under Article 109. Special powers are federal keys, not a general supremacy over Lok Sabha.

Toppers' copies

Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.