Revision summary
The quote correctly names four roles: preacher, goonda, politician, and financier. Rumour and identity insult turn a quarrel into a communal frame. Property, liquor, and contractor money often sit behind the religious label. Police delay and partisan posting can complete the riot system. The reply is equal IPC enforcement and mixed neighbourhoods, not only blaming the four.
Model answer
Introduction
The four-part formula is a useful police and judicial sketch of how a riot is assembled. A comment must agree that fanatics, goondas, politicians, and money often chain together, then add that rumour, police delay, and property markets also belong in the chain — and that the Constitution still names a secular public duty.
Body
The four actors named in the line
- Religious fanatics supply the sermon, the pamphlet, and the rumour that a festival, a slaughterhouse, or a loudspeaker is an existential insult; without that framing, a street fight stays a street fight.
- Anti-social elements — known riot specialists, liquor and land mafias — convert the sermon into the first stone, the first fire, and the looting of a particular mohalla, which is why inquiry commissions repeatedly find the same local names.
- Political activists provide protection, selective outrage, and the promise that cases will weaken; communal polarisation has been an electoral tactic from the late colonial riots through post-independence urban clashes.
- Vested interests finance processions, arms, and bail: real-estate clearing of mixed neighbourhoods, smuggling routes, and contractor rivalries often sit behind a ‘religious’ clash, so the last clause of the quote is not cynicism but political economy.
What the quote leaves out — and the reply
- The state is not only a victim: delayed FIR, partisan posting, and refusal to use riot-control manuals turn a spark into a pogrom; Paul Brass’s ‘institutionalised riot system’ describes this production, not a spontaneous crowd.
- Neighbourhood peace committees, mixed mohallas, and fast-track courts under ordinary IPC sections 153A, 295A, and 302, plus the 2005 amendments on hate speech practice, are the legal middle; special statutes fail if the local thana will not act.
- Uttar Pradesh’s own record — from older city riots to Muzaffarnagar 2013 — shows the four actors, but also displacement, gendered violence, and social media rumour, which the 2018 wording does not yet name.
- The comment therefore accepts the quote as a correct division of labour in many riots, and insists that secular law, police accountability, and mixed economic stakes must be added or the formula becomes an alibi for the administration.
Flow diagram
flowchart TD F[Religious fanatics rumour] --> R[Communal riot] A[Anti-social first violence] --> R P[Political protection] --> R V[Vested finance land] --> R S[Police delay] --> R R --> L[Law mixed mohalla peace]
Conclusion
Fanatics, anti-social cadres, politicians, and financiers do assemble communal violence. The fuller comment is that the state can join that assembly by omission, and that peace is mixed neighbourhoods plus equal law, not only a moral appeal against the four villains.
Quick related
Students also ask
-
Evaluate the changing status of women in India.
Next question in the 2018 paper (Q5). View answer →
-
Does the quote mean ordinary believers cause riots?
No. It points to fanatics and specialists, not the whole community. Most neighbours do not loot; the danger is when politicians treat the community as a vote bank after the fire.
-
Is finance always from ‘the other’ community?
No. Vested interests include same-community real-estate and criminal capital that profit from ghettoisation. The quote is about motive, not a communal ledger.
PYQ trend
When UPSC asked this
Related PYQs from other years, newest first. Open a question to read it.
-
2025 · Q4 · UPGS1 · 8 marks
Does globalization lead to both cultural integration and cultural conflict? Elucidate. -
2025 · Q16 · UPGS1 · 12 marks
What are the visible effects of globalization on family, marriage and kinship system? Analyse with reference to the Indian society. -
2024 · Q4 · UPGS1 · 8 marks
Discuss the impacts of Globalisation on Indian Society. -
2022 · Q15 · UPGS1 · 12 marks
Define Globalization and Privatization. Discuss their objectives. -
2021 · Q15 · UPGS1 · 12 marks
Define globalization. Assess its impacts on rural social structure in India. -
2020 · Q15 · UPGS1 · 12 marks
What is Liberalization? How is it affecting the Indian social structure? -
2018 · Q16 · UPGS1 · 12 marks
What is globalization? Discuss its impact on the social structure of India.
More from this paper
Q1 · UPSC Mains 2018 · UPGS1 · 8 marks
Explain the role of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel in the integration of Princely States of India.
Post-independence consolidation
Patel and V. P. Menon ran the States Department from July 1947. The Instrument of Accession covered defence, external affairs, and communications. Most rulers were persuaded with privy purses and Rajpramukh rank; unions preceded 1950. Junagadh was settled by plebiscite; Hyderabad by Operation Polo in September 1948. Administrative merger of armies, currency, and services made accession real.
Q2 · UPSC Mains 2018 · UPGS1 · 8 marks
Describe the role of Buddhist literature in the creation of world peace.
Indian culture
The Dhammapada and Metta Sutta teach that hatred is not ended by hatred and that goodwill is a social duty. Jatakas and kingship suttas tie peace to just rule and the removal of poverty. Ashoka’s edicts after Kalinga turn canonical ahimsa into dhamma-vijaya. The Tripitaka and Mahayana sutras travelled across Asia as a shared ethic. UN Vesak and modern engaged Buddhism reuse that literature as a peace language.
Q3 · UPSC Mains 2018 · UPGS1 · 8 marks
Mahatma Gandhi represents the middle-path approach in Indian politics. Give logical explanation.
Freedom struggle
Gandhi stood between revolutionary violence and purely legal Council politics. Satyagraha and the Constructive Programme were that method, from Champaran to the Salt March. Trusteeship refused both laissez-faire capitalism and Bolshevik seizure. He used religious idiom without accepting communal two-nation logic or caste untouchability. The middle path has caste-and-class limits, yet it is a distinct third way, not empty centrism.
Toppers' copies
Toppers' copies for this question will be uploaded soon.